I just finished reading the TPB of Ultimates 2 - Grand Theft America and have been greatly reinforced in my notion that, well, Mark Millar is a twit - and I haven't even touched the Civil War stuff he's done for Marvel, where he made Iron Man a jack-booted thug and earned the enmity of a lot of other fans.
Why?
It's not because he likes write polemic in comics he writes. Not even because he does that in a manner most commonly described as "Green Party masturbatory fantasies" or has Mary Sue characters rail in frustration at the stupidity of humanity. It's because he's really bad at making coherent points about the real world while using fiction set in a setting that's very alien from our own, especially when he's actually helped shape much of that setting.
Background in this case:
• In the "Ultimate Marvel" setting, SHIELD is not the original-Marvel upright military task force that's vaguely referred to as being a NATO or UN operation. Instead, it's basically something like its own branch of the US military with a weirdly fascist logo of a stylized eagle. They have a whole fleet of flying aircraft carriers, legions of foot-soldiers, swarms of guys in battle-suits, an intelligence branch that sounds right out of a paranoid's worst fears, and a major program of trying to develop a super-human military force. They naturally have more funding than God, and are actually often used as an entertaining synthesis of military/spy porn in their uber-competence and the threat of authority in their ruthlessness.
• The Ultimates are this setting's Avengers, except they exist as the very pointy end of the SHIELD spear and mostly violently kill anyone they go up against. As that's mainly been alien invaders, not too bad.
• At the end of the prior volume of the series, the Ultimates (with SHIELD backup) were seen forcibly relieving an unnamed Middle Eastern Country of its honest-and-for-true nuclear arsenal.
So...in this volume of Ultimates, there's blowback from that invasion. We see the details of that strike on nuclear facilities in, of all countries, Azerbaijan. For irony later hammered in, we see a 98-pound weakling named Abdul start on the path of vengeance after he gets barked at by Captain America during the forcible evacuation of his nearby village (presumably due to contaminants released during the attack). After he makes some really mild gripes to a friend about how it's unfair that his village has to be evacuated, someone among the evacuees says he knows of folks who let make him able to stop this sort of thing... So, terrorists with some sort of super-human-making technology? OK, decent setup...
Well, no. Apparently, a big plot is a-brewing by "the enemies of the United States". France, Russia, China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea (?!) have all covertly joined forces to take down the United States. In a meeting in Paris, apparently under the Louvre (???) one month before the first strike, they talk up their plans to use Russian troops in sleek power-suits, a small army of giant robots, huge starship-looking carriers, and their own (inevitable) superhuman team called the "Liberators" - led, of course, by Abdul, who's the only person besides Steve Rogers to have responded well to the super-soldier serum. (Apparently, that guy from his village had their number or something...)
Then, they proceed to stomp in and take over the US in an amazing cakewalk, making a speech about how America's ambitions have exceeded its capabilities as they knock down the Statue of Liberty. (The rest of the story involves the inevitable comeback by the Ultimates, with some mostly-offscreen assistance by the EU superhuman team and the many superheroes of NYC.)
At that point in the story, however, I'm making peculiar faces.
Why is a Scottish lefty using a plot that sounds like some warblogger comic geek's fever-dream? Why does a Russian whine about the Motherland being reduced to a nation of "hookers and gangsters" when they have the resources to field a really damn effective army of guys in super-strong, flying battlesuits? Why do members of the Liberators, recruited in "Terror Trials" and mostly coming from very undemocratic countries, discuss in all seriousness letting the American people have free elections, especially since many were unhappy with the selection of "their last Caesar"?
(And for the nonpolitical stuff, you get many, many questions, starting with "How the Hell does torturing 'defense codes' out of poor Hawkeye let them fly a fleet of giant airships across oceans and into the airspace of pretty much every major US city without anyone noticing until they actually arrive?")
And just why, after setting everything up as a muddled tale of blowback, does he reveal that everything's actually due to the evil machinations of Loki, who's trying to bring about Ragnarök?
Augh.


Re: Comics - Mark Millar Is a Twit
Regarding "Civil War", Julian Sanchez wrote an interesting article making the case that Iron Man was the real hero of the story, no matter how they spun it in the books. In any real world or parallel universe there's just no way people are going to tolerate costumed vigilantes duking it out in downtown Manhattan & causing massive collateral damage on a daily basis. No fucking way. Think about it - some crazy shoots people in a school somewhere and people immediately call for weapon bans, registration etc. Given that is it realistic to expect that people will allow the Avengers to fight Count Nefaria in their backyards ?
But yes, Millar is just not that imaginative a writer, he just dials the carnage up to 11 in lieu of a fully realized story. Also, portraying the US as an out-of-control near-dictatorship is his standard schitck. He does pretty much the same with that other team - the one with Apollo and the Midnighter etc.
BTW, I blame Alan Moore for all this, ever since he did Miracleman lesser writers have been trying to do real superheroes in the real world and the Ultmates is the end result.
Re: Comics - Mark Millar Is a Twit
Ah, The Authority.
That all would have been a lot better if someone had sat Millar down in a bar and gently explained that he's not Warren Ellis.
Re: Comics - Mark Millar Is a Twit
I actually have respect for Civil War for what it became in spite of what they tried to make it. I also hate Iron Man and wish that they had killed him and turned all superheroes into outlaws, with someone leading an offshoot of SHIELD that provided them with cover.
As for the Ultimates; I never touch the crap. Other than Ultimate X-Men, it's all just an attempt to inject modernity into the comics while trying to keep all the same formulas from before intact.
I CAUTION YOU / IN DEFEATING ORCS WE MAY FIND THE ONLY VILLAIN LEFT TO FACE IS OUR OWN PREJUDICE--qwantz.com
Re: Comics - Mark Millar Is a Twit
Actually, I'd say Ultimates has a much more divergent premise than Ultimate X-Men, but a lot of the charm of Ultimate Spider-Man and Ultimate Fantastic Four has been seeing the basic premises re-interpreted in new ways. (And, as in Ultimate X-Men, having a fanboy grin when they introduce a supporting character with a familiar name, but cleverly different concept.)
...Well, aside from Ultimate Daredevil and Ultimate Iron Man, which lost me after the first collections. A Matt Murdoch who's indistinguishable from the original and acts like he's been operating forever in a setting where costumed superheroes are new is just a wrong-headed as a mutated super-genius, super-regenerating Tony Stark who has to glop his sensitive skin in a chemical that makes him nigh-invulnerable - and doesn't act at all like the well-meaning zillionaire playboy drunk he's been consistently shown as in the setting.
EDIT: The latter is even worse considering it's Orson Scott Card lazily going to his bone-dry "supergenius kids and inexplicably evil supergenius kids" well for the nth time.
Re: Comics - Mark Millar Is a Twit
The other day, though, I realized something that amused me about Civil War and the Ultimates plotline - Millar's two stories here are inverses of each other. In the Civil War event, the Avengers have vaguely plausible political reality slam into fairly traditional superheroics and mangle the more-or-less four-color status quo. On the other hand, at the end of this story, the Ultimates break away from SHIELD after truly nutso politics to try to become what looks like a traditional superhero team (in a setting that doesn't have traditional superhero teams).
No, I have no idea why you'd really want to do either, but there you go.